6-pages (825 Words)
INSTRUCTIONS
In the ADR in Healthcare Malpractice: Research Paper Assignment, you will apply the sources from your ADR in Healthcare Malpractice: Annotated Bibliography Assignment, as well as others you may have found, to explore the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in healthcare.
Include options for Bible-based dispute resolution, focusing on the issues raised in using ADR to resolve malpractice claims without, or limiting, litigation.
Your paper must examine what options you would recommend for your healthcare facility, with support from your research and analysis.
The final paper must include at least five scholarly sources other than the Learn materials and the Bible, cited in-text and in a reference list. You must also integrate biblical analysis of the topic into the paper.
The ADR in Healthcare Malpractice: Research Paper must contain at least 1,500 words and follow current APA format. The title page, abstract, and reference list do not count towards the length requirement. Submit your paper as a Word document.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool. For more information about Turnitin, click
Minimum 8 outside sources for citations.
Details of the assignment and added specifics can be found within the Brightspace assignment tab.
Again, for all the above, follow the proper APA formatting.
Again, for all the above, follow the proper APA formatting.
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) has emerged as a modern technique for resolving conflicts due to its cost-effectiveness and efficacy. Their mission is to provide treatment that improves, not compromises, overall wellness. Patients select healthcare sites based on confidence, anticipating superb service and personalized attention (Tahura, 2019). Patients relies on their emotional connection to the services offered by the practitioners, and use their instincts to judge the quality of the services. The lack of understanding of the healthcare operations puts patients at risk of becoming victims of malpractice. Fault negligence for these incidents, triggering medical malpractice lawsuits against hospitals or physicians. In this regard, embracing alternative dispute resolution techniques is vital to tackle these problems without leaning wholly on the justice system.
Healthcare institutions strive to offer top-notch care to patients, regardless of financial status. It encompasses various non-litigious approaches that enable parties to settle disputes outside of court. As disputes in healthcare continue to rise, applying ADR has become critical for reducing legal expenditures and case durations (Tahura, 2019). The ceaseless spike in conflicts stresses ADR's sustained usefulness and worth as a non-litigious approach to resolving disagreements, underlining its indispensable function in supplying efficient and feasible solutions for moderating contentious matters within Western communities. ADR is practiced by settling conflicts through methods other than litigation (Balzer & Schneider, 2021). The unrelenting increase of disputes across Western countries powerfully signals the lasting pertinence and importance of alternative conflict mitigation techniques. This steady upswing spotlights the ongoing need and efficacy of methods such as alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in competently handling intensifying claims. Common procedures like litigation, early apologies, arbitration, and mediation can cost-effectively resolve healthcare disputes (Tahura, 2019). ADR's flexibility benefits all parties, cementing its importance. Once a healthcare provider dispute surfaces, ADR offers the optimal path to resolution.
Arbitration
Arbitration has emerged as a favorable alternative dispute resolution approach within healthcare, bearing multiple benefits over litigation materialized as a salient alternative dispute resolution technique within healthcare, tendering a structured yet adaptable approach for extrajudicial conflict settlement. Within this sphere, intricate medical concerns and patient care intricacies frequently emerge, making arbitration’s expedited resolutions particularly constructive. The process entails neutral arbitrators or panels assessing evidence and arguments from disagreeing parties to render binding determinations (Pozgar, 2018). This methodology proves uniquely advantageous in tackling disputes encompassing medical negligence accusations, provider contract quarrels, or patient-organization disagreements. The Bible actively supports arbitration as a solution to conflict, prioritizing both reconciliation and justice. Passages like Matthew 18:15-17 stress the importance of resolving disputes privately first, escalating to witnesses if necessary, ultimately promoting peaceful solutions. Similarly, Proverbs 18:18 highlights arbitration's role in resolving disagreements, preventing conflict and promoting understanding (Rouméas, 2020). The biblical principle of seeking neutral mediators aligns with the concept of arbitration, ensuring fair and just outcomes. By advocating for peaceful settlements and restoration, the Bible underscores the value of arbitration in resolving conflicts while preserving relationships and fostering harmony. ..................................--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------